“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations, including any questions or determination by or against any government or authority, a person shall be entitled to a fair hearing within a reasonable time by a court or other tribunal established by law and constituted in such manner as to secure its independent and impartiality”.
The word ‘Reasonable’ in its ordinary meaning means moderate, tolerable or not excessive. What is a reasonable in relation to the question whether an accused has a fair trial within a reasonable time depends on the circumstances of each particular case, including the place or country where the trial took place, the resources and and infrastructures available to the appropriate organs in the Country. It is, therefore, misleading to use the standards or the situations of things in one of a particular country to determine the questions whether trials of criminal cases in another country involves an unreasonable delay- A demand for a speedy trial, which has no regards to the conditions and circumstances in this country, will be unrealistic and be worse than unreasonable delay in trial itself.
‘……it is now beyond the place of arguments to say that as officers of the courts, we do not owe duty to our society or community. The welfare of the community is preserved when the public is satisfied with the standards of the administration of justice. It is our firm conviction that either a criminal or civil trial, the stake which the community has in seeing that justice is done is so great that when and if it turns out that justice is not done, society will frown at it and condemn what has been handed down as justice by the court. Justice has to be done regardless of who and whom is a party’.